Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 100% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	382% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	47.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '22 at 08:03
Run Duration	397 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11700K-$230 65,651 User benchmarks, average bench 101% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 84.6 1-Core 161 2-Core 300 99% 182 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 1,014 94% 787 Pts	64-Core 1,578 98% 1,578 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.1% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 132 Parallax 118 94% 122 fps	MRender 169 Gravity 101 Splatting 112 102% 127 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB 15,095 User benchmarks, average bench 369% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: 613200WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 3317 1070 957 961 906 924 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	382% Outstanding	Read 2877 Write 3,772 Mixed 2,780 SusWrite 1,356 608% 2,696 MB/s	4K Read 78.1 4K Write 252 4K Mixed 104 386% 145 MB/s	DQ Read 1,709 DQ Write 1,244 DQ Mixed 1,473 1,102% 1,475 MB/s
Poor: 234% ↑ This bench: 382% Great: 494%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 657GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2034 1734 1724 1695 1724 1725 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	336% Outstanding	Read 1,979 Write 2,184 Mixed 1,763 SusWrite 1,772 434% 1,925 MB/s	4K Read 47.9 4K Write 206 4K Mixed 73 275% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,644 DQ Write 1,253 DQ Mixed 1,427 1,073% 1,441 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 336% Great: 347%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 131 135 136 132 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 138 Write 136 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 134 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 101%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$49 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 771GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 148 148 148 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 146 Write 138 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 146 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 87%
WD My Passport 2599 4TB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 2TB free, PID 2599 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 33 35 35 36 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 32.5 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 32.1 43% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 45%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 3,373 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 39GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 41 20 24 21 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 152 Write 63.5 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 30 94% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3.2 214% 4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 48%
WD My Passport 2626 4TB 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2TB free, PID 2626 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 92 92 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 89.2 Write 89.2 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 92.3 116% 85 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 112% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE M378A2K43CB1-CTD M378A2G43AB3-CWE M378A2K43CB1-CTD 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3200, 2667, 3200, 2667 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 35.2 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 26.1 SC Write 40.4 SC Mixed 31.9 94% 32.8 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 106%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

CPU
Core i7-11700KIntel $230Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	3,846x
Core i5-11600KIntel $180Bench 99%, 43,966 samples	1,288x
Core i9-11900KIntel $254Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	1,180x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,188x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,181x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	939x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	913x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	493x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GTZR 2x16GBGBench 91%, 10,357 samples	353x
CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 45,582 samples	311x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $67Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	305x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $836

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16