Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookAir6,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookAir6,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7DF21CB3ED6977E5
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4260U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 114
35% 63.2 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 179
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4240
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 6.5
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 310 334 273 273 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 305
Write 316
Mixed 294
SusWrite 290
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 14
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 84.8
DQ Write 97.5
DQ Mixed 111
78% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x45424A3230554638454455302D474E2D4620 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir6,2 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir6,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback