Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 20:30
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$158
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 1,012
93% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$730
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
183% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 237
Parallax 297
216% 266 fps
MRender 302
Gravity 219
Splatting 162
179% 228 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 183%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 120GB-$30
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 41 47 45 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 355
Write 66.9
Mixed 134
SusWrite 46.8
33% 151 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 7.7
87% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 10
28% 62.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 66%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
120GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 287 287 288 289 289 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 479
Mixed 425
SusWrite 308
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 45.5
154% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 270
201% 270 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
176GB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 456 460 462 461 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 449
Mixed 446
SusWrite 459
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 316 315 314 312 314 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 450
Mixed 409
SusWrite 330
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 56.3
188% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 40.6
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 31.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $873
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback