Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	92.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 171 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 518 53% 428 Pts	64-Core 693 43% 693 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB 12,228 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Asus(1043 886D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.4% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 105 Parallax 117 96% 113 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 108 Splatting 90.8 86% 107 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 102%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 433 Write 408 Mixed 370 90% 404 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 47.6 152% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 351 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 122%
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 814GB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 33 34 33 33 33 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB 11,542 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 40.3 MC Mixed 36.5 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 85.2 47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	29x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GBCorsairBench 89%, 2,538 samples	15x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	13x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $774

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16