HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 1% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 03:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 40.7
28% 39.7 Pts
4-Core 69.2
8-Core 110
11% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 4TB
987GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 228 226 263 236 260 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.3% Outstanding
Read 304
Write 312
Mixed 317
SusWrite 244
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 47.8
169% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 269
203% 273 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 101%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 173 151 175 160 161 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 96.2
Write 93.6
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 170
25% 109 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 7.6
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 15
12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HP 669239-081 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.2
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback