Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 VISION G  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220124
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700-$295
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 255
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 973
90% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43% Average
Lighting 51.7
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 50.1
42% 54.4 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 58.6
45% 54.1 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
691GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1269 798 674 423 435 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,572
Write 1,745
Mixed 1,332
SusWrite 669
299% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 59.4
199% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 570
425% 574 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 191%
Great: 274%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1533 1661 1671 1653 1669 1669 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,452
Write 2,313
Mixed 1,805
SusWrite 1,643
461% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 63.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 80.9
261% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 610
472% 652 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 310%
Great: 410%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
349GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 212 212 214 212 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 343
Mixed 245
SusWrite 217
72% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 42.9
133% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 191
185% 294 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$40
600GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 91 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 134
Write 123
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 91.5
67% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 211 212 213 212 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 161
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 208
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 118%
Great: 114%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 169 169 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 167
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 170
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 108%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 91.2
Write 27.1
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 30.1
52% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.3
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 25.4
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z590 VISION G Builds (Compare 2,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback