Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340-$278
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 171
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 323
44% 326 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 19.1
15% 18.7 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.4
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 148 143 101 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 181
Write 173
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 117
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
53GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.7 0.4 3.9 2.6 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 28.4
Write 0.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 2.3
9% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.95 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
19GB free, PID 6410
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 24 21 7.2 1.8 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
Read 32.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 12.5
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-123.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 6.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback