Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 128
2-Core 239
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 699
68% 556 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 210
Parallax 204
190% 216 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 146
Splatting 135
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1558 438 760 497 473 484 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 894
Write 3,743
Mixed 324
SusWrite 702
323% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 3.5
34% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 908
579% 641 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 111%
Great: 499%
Samsung 870 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 149 150 153 151 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 405
Write 394
Mixed 366
SusWrite 174
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 125
99% 135 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 117%
ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
10.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 235 241 251 252 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 223
Write 235
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 243
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 1.2
29% 8.6 MB/s
DQ Read 5.3
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 0.9
3% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 78 87 82 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 67.7
Write 125
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 78.9
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 139 139 151 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 74.6
Write 104
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 142
61% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.3
163% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80
824GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 85 86 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 137
Write 107
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 84.3
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
590GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 186 188 195 196 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 101
Write 78.3
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 190
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4WL.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 40.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.4
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 31.2
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback