Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 20:27
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$280
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 293
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 969
91% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,916
119% 1,916 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 51.4
Parallax 77
39% 58.9 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 56.4
Splatting 40.8
40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 84 41 31 84 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 302
Write 280
Mixed 104
SusWrite 83.8
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 3.3
18% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 56%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$69
702GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 117 120 120 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 108
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 114
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
432GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 78 79 80 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 57.7
Mixed 54
SusWrite 75.8
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST10000NE0008-2JM101 10TB
8TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 175 177 203 191 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 213
Write 197
Mixed 117
SusWrite 176
129% 176 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
596% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-4000C18-8GTZRB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 34.3
119% 41.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 115%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 11,332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $807
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback