Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 16:05
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 495
61% 465 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 78.3
46% 64.6 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 40.5
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DM F550 240G 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200807
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 367 375 383 379 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 393
Write 25.5
Mixed 273
SusWrite 371
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 11.5
100% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 16.2
59% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
462GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 73 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 72.4
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$57
187GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 103
Write 36.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 37.9
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
169GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 96 95 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.7
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 94
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback