Asus Z77-A

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z77-A (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '22 at 07:31
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 165 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 361 40% 315 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Palit(1569 F278) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 199 Parallax 194 180% 205 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 149 Splatting 129 124% 155 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Smartbuy 120GB 120GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN09107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 11 31 32 37 8.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 435 Write 29.3 Mixed 59 SusWrite 24.4 29% 137 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 12.2 76% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 20.3 30% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 106%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 99GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 207 214 216 277 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 337 Write 147 Mixed 200 SusWrite 232 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 22.5 88% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 48.8 DQ Write 51.1 DQ Mixed 45.8 36% 48.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 100%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$54 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 882GB free Firmware: 01.01V02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 127 128 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 102 SusWrite 126 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/4G 859B BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 89C2 KRE-D3U1600M/4G 859B BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 16GB 1800, 1800, 1800, 1800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.4% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 17 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	112x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	74x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16