Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '22 at 14:40
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 186
2-Core 344
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 698
8-Core 1,198
115% 948 Pts
64-Core 1,726
107% 1,726 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8828) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 172
Parallax 161
143% 170 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 135
Splatting 115
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21705000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 972 746 748 751 766 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,505
Write 1542
Mixed 1294
SusWrite 962
298% 1,326 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 210
4K Mixed 63.6
270% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 893
DQ Write 1,324
DQ Mixed 1,347
952% 1,188 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 250%
Great: 283%
Samsung MZ7PD512HAGM-00000 512GB
186GB free
Firmware: DXM0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 129 123 133 135 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 281
Mixed 294
SusWrite 136
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47.8
169% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 151
159% 266 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$70
645GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 172 185 176 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 130
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 178
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
380GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 71.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 87
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.8% Above average
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback