bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '22 at 19:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 254
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 254
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.1.2.49151
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 43.8
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 45
36% 49.5 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 45.5
28% 32.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
91GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 166 173 173 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
Read 302
Write 271
Mixed 257
SusWrite 171
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 18.1
72% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 45.2
57% 102 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 25
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.4
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback