Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-8950HK 14,729 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 182 62% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 318 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 18.1.1.53328 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 1 11% 13 fps	MRender 17.4 Gravity 3.7 Splatting 16.2 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 74GB free (System drive) Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 430 385 704 335 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	115% Outstanding	Read 1,412 Write 1,038 Mixed 1,157 SusWrite 467 228% 1,019 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 20.7 66% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 281 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 180 138% 192 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x16GB 15,722 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	61.9% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 22.3 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 1 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,059x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325