Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	112.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210924
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '22 at 10:14
Run Duration	370 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 109 2-Core 197 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 671 59% 503 Pts	64-Core 960 59% 960 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 865F) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 179 Reflection 177 Parallax 176 146% 177 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 160 Splatting 130 127% 159 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 2.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1643 1628 1462 1574 1644 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 2,420 Write 1,921 Mixed 2038 SusWrite 1,578 446% 1,989 MB/s	4K Read 62 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 77.1 244% 78.7 MB/s	DQ Read 589 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 426 317% 429 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 565%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 700 Write 613 Mixed 644 146% 652 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 79.3 258% 88.7 MB/s	DQ Read 680 DQ Write 546 DQ Mixed 608 456% 611 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 873GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,382 Write 2,335 Mixed 1,777 482% 2,165 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 80 266% 95.7 MB/s	DQ Read 675 DQ Write 533 DQ Mixed 595 447% 601 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate Expansion HDD 18TB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 8TB free Firmware: 1801 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 41.1 Write 39.1 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 40.4 9% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 1 25% 8.17 MB/s	DQ Read 4.5 DQ Write 8.2 DQ Mixed 0.1 2% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 42%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 234GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 177 175 175 176 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 118 118 120 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 201 Mixed 62 SusWrite 120 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 131%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 36.4 Write 38.1 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 40.3 28% 37.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 208% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2.5TB free Firmware: D781 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 141 Write 142 Mixed 81.1 90% 121 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 322% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Intenso External USB 3.0 6TB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 5.5TB free Firmware: 1402 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 41.5 Write 40.9 Mixed 34.1 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 370% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 88%
ASMT 2115 5TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 3.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 153 149 153 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 142 Write 143 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 152 165% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 76.4 Write 90.4 Mixed 73.2 105% 80 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 193% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 6.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 82.2 Write 105 Mixed 80.8 118% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 194% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 128GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 23.6 MC Write 51.3 MC Mixed 27.8 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 10 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	497x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	261x
Core i7-7740XIntel $235Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	149x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	169x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	95x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $796

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16