Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 12:04
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 255
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 381
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 570 521 542 636 1499 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,033
Write 1,677
Mixed 1,319
SusWrite 693
268% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 84.3
276% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 901
723% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 218%
Great: 295%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
232GB free
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 62 58 56 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 72.9
Write 70.9
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 61.2
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.9
344% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
698GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 36 41 44 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 74.9
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 50.7
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
847GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 83 78 72 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 76.7
Write 129
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 80.3
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$14
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 3.1 1.3 1.5 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 78.2
Write 32.3
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 3.3
38% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 30%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 22 9.5 8.8 35 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21% Poor
Read 98.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 16.1
51% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
77% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 21%
Great: 22%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
212GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 54 54 52 53 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 86.1
Write 57.8
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 54
79% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback