Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20091

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20091  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110614
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 71
2-Core 136
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 341
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3981) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.4
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.28.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 122 118 119 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 341
Write 138
Mixed 179
SusWrite 120
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 22.9
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 117
97% 139 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20091 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20091

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback