Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics64% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory35.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201231
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$227
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 168
2-Core 331
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,265
115% 965 Pts
64-Core 2,311
143% 2,311 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 75
Parallax 77.9
65% 77.5 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 77.8
Splatting 58.2
62% 79.3 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
63GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 452 452 455 454 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 405
SusWrite 451
101% 451 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 57.7
189% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
168GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 66 69 69 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 97.3
Mixed 83
SusWrite 72.2
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
16GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 40 45 38 42 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 57
SusWrite 41.7
33% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
300GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.9 5.9 6 5.9 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 7.1
19% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
174% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 94%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
599GB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 32.6
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 6.2
33% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 39
69% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 59%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
520GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.8 5.7 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 36
Write 32.5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 6.3
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.4
220% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 35.4
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 31.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,004
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback