Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics220% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '22 at 23:51
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 797
69% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Lighting 327
Reflection 299
Parallax 345
267% 324 fps
MRender 370
Gravity 268
Splatting 193
217% 277 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 220%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 692 657 639 619 584 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2055
Write 1,633
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 666
329% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 90.1
297% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1216
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 1,046
783% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 262%
Great: 410%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
229GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 375 372 373 371 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 436
Mixed 300
SusWrite 377
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 41.9
157% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 227
204% 310 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
187GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 405 404 405 404 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,091
Write 2,027
Mixed 1,455
SusWrite 583
344% 1,539 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 89.1
317% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 960
DQ Mixed 1,115
799% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 261%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 12.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 9.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299X DESIGNARE 10G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback