MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 00:02
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 236
58% 115 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 392
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 413
26% 413 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 21.7
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 14.1
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 73.1
66% 76 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 56.6
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000GB 1TB
864GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1296 1363 1339 1221 1031 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 850
Write 1,040
Mixed 865
SusWrite 1,044
215% 950 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 20.9
123% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 429
378% 562 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 161%
Great: 228%
Adata SU630 240GB
18GB free
Firmware: V8X04c12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 381
Write 349
Mixed 284
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 34.1
124% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 190
148% 200 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
444GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 137 135 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 145
Write 128
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 136
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4B.8FD CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 BL8G26C16U4B.8FD CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.8% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 23.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback