Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG Z690 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D30)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 147%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive500% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D30
MotherboardMSI MPG Z690 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D30)  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$187
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 88.1
1-Core 208
2-Core 391
121% 229 Pts
4-Core 793
8-Core 1,471
135% 1,132 Pts
64-Core 2,381
147% 2,381 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2405) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 143
Parallax 245
102% 171 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 129
Splatting 154
138% 172 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$331
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3870 3758 3831 3808 3803 3807 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
500% Outstanding
Read 1,952
Write 3,522
Mixed 2,111
SusWrite 3,813
649% 2,850 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 98
328% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 2,148
DQ Write 1,803
DQ Mixed 1,807
1,400% 1,920 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 500%
Great: 500%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
818GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2051 2060 2013 1994 637 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 1,474
Write 2,000
Mixed 1,639
SusWrite 1,527
376% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 92.6
315% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,948
DQ Write 1,671
DQ Mixed 1,635
1,273% 1,752 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 330%
Great: 365%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 24
Write 14.2
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 24.2
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR5 5600 C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
190% Outstanding
MC Read 77.2
MC Write 75.7
MC Mixed 71.1
213% 74.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 52.4
SC Mixed 35.3
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 123%
This bench: 190%
Great: 191%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z690 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D30) Builds (Compare 5,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 CARBON WIFI (MS-7D30)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $1,124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback