MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200109
Uptime	13.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 145 2-Core 264 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 880 85% 700 Pts	64-Core 1,355 84% 1,355 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.8% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 109 Parallax 110 84% 107 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 101 Splatting 98.4 80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 284GB free Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 353 245 349 298 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 280 Write 252 Mixed 164 SusWrite 326 58% 256 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 33.6 94% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 165 127% 175 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,646 Write 2,524 Mixed 1,964 530% 2,378 MB/s	4K Read 69.4 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 96.1 325% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1,388 DQ Write 1,147 DQ Mixed 1,206 920% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G36C16U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB 2,498 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.5% Good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 27.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 25.3 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,086x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	997x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	622x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	449x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	377x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	340x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	230x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	186x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	150x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	239x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	115x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $900

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16