Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 09:40
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G7400
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 236
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 378
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 18.4
15% 14.6 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 16.8
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1573 675 152 153 149 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,344
Write 1,328
Mixed 1,402
SusWrite 477
256% 1,138 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 91.1
324% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,574
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,211
938% 1,295 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 242%
Great: 295%
Kingston SNVSE1000G 1TB
469GB free
Firmware: EDFK5N0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1565 1565 1575 1573 1563 1580 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,000
Write 1,531
Mixed 1,067
SusWrite 1,570
294% 1,292 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 73.5
290% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 767
618% 852 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 264%
Great: 280%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 139 138 137 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 69.3
Write 127
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 138
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 124 123 122 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 66.3
Write 117
Mixed 68
SusWrite 121
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$40
423GB free
Firmware: SM36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 96.1
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 94
63% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
364% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 65%
Adplus SuperVer 750GB
699GB free
Firmware: 6302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 92.6
Write 91.1
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 96.7
61% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
17GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 13 7.2 11 11 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 79.9
Write 18.7
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 9.2
40% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 28%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 32GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 41.7
Write 23.1
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 13.8
32% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.7
98% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 22%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
463GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 40.8
Write 35.9
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 41.7
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
79% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback