Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 01:15
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 231
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 704
67% 552 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.9% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 115
Parallax 128
105% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 105
Splatting 90.7
90% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 584 576 557 538 473 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,379
Write 2,145
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 626
411% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 69.9
242% 81.9 MB/s
DQ Read 844
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 292
369% 655 MB/s
Poor: 234%
This bench: 246%
Great: 494%
Inland NVMe SSD 512GB
476GB free
Firmware: T1202A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 1204 1191 1111 1197 1197 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 1,206
Mixed 1,049
SusWrite 1,180
298% 1,334 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 29.2
172% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 438
399% 602 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 229%
Great: 308%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
54GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 65.6
Mixed 42
SusWrite 63.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 63%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 131 130 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 105
Write 88.4
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 128
71% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 23.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback