Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 06:32
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$261
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 338
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 632
8-Core 1,232
110% 932 Pts
64-Core 2,102
130% 2,102 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 211
Parallax 200
182% 212 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
585GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 51 53 70 58 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 435
Write 90.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 60.9
38% 178 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 24.7
97% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 111
86% 122 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 121%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
194GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 234 246 334 284 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 367
Write 402
Mixed 376
SusWrite 284
81% 357 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 27.9
81% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 220
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
348GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 92 100 134 115 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 94.6
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 114
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST2000VX003-1HH164 2TB
572GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 81 85 116 99 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 74.6
Write 131
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 98.9
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$86
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $681
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback