Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 19:34
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 78
2-Core 150
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 457
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.31% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 60
Parallax 7.5
5% 24.4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.5
7% 7.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.31%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 248 247 233 240 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,641
Write 362
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 258
197% 895 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 57.3
184% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 735
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 629
469% 628 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 167%
Great: 297%
ROG ESD-S1C 1TB
398GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 2
Write 1
0% 1.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
1% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 23.2
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback