AZW GT-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAZW GT-R  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW GT-R
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 17:00
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 227
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 538
54% 440 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 20.6
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 13
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0928A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 574 227 77 93 182 93 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,592
Write 741
Mixed 798
SusWrite 208
184% 835 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 21.6
122% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 114
130% 222 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 124%
Great: 166%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 196 203 204 206 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
WD Elements 2TB
381GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 30.3
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 13.8
34% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 34
Write 28.9
Mixed 27
SusWrite 14
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 44%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68MYMN1 6TB
5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 121 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 123
Write 129
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 120
156% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%
ST16000N M001G-2KK103 16TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 112 121 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 184
Mixed 128
SusWrite 120
207% 158 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.3
456% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 1.3
455% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 129%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
2TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 29.5
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 13.6
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 CT8G4SFS824A.C8FP 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 21.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 23.1
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GT-R Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: AZW GT-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback