bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 02:45
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 52
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 131
47% 82.7 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 484
45% 372 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Asus(1043 0470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.5% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 82.6
50% 70.9 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 43.3
42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual SATA Hard Drive 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 390 395 403 406 406 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.8% Very good
Read 408
Write 399
Mixed 372
SusWrite 398
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 24.4
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 187
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
Vmware Virtual SATA Hard Drive 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 00000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 176 175 165 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 184
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 168
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 17.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback