Today's hottest deals

Edsys EDCUAQI5SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemEdsys EDCUAQI5SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Q170M-MK
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 10:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 198
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 618
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 113
Parallax 130
104% 124 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 115
Splatting 105
105% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66C5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 367 191 75 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 434
Write 308
Mixed 330
SusWrite 182
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 29.8
132% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 182
163% 243 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 19.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EDCUAQI5SFF Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

System: Edsys EDCUAQI5SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $580
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback