Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 18:58
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 546
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 19.4
13% 14.9 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 15.9
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 423 239 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 405
Write 384
Mixed 353
SusWrite 256
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 35.4
127% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 296
215% 276 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 95%
Patriot Memory 127GB
12GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 244
Write 233
Mixed 154
261% 210 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
88% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4S0-AGS1O5IK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 15.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback