bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 06:30
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.2% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 148
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 297
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 81.3
Parallax 63.7
58% 72.1 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 61
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco virtual de Microsoft 137GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 11 19 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 14.7
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 5120 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback