bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '24 at 21:41
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 151
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 259
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.6% Average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 54.1
39% 54.8 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 50.1
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 86GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 763
Write 708
Mixed 632
156% 701 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 19.3
62% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 266
202% 276 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 5120 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 64 0" 1280 720 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback