HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 17:22
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 340
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Simmtronics 2.5SATA 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1A30F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 374 362 199 28 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 417
Write 390
Mixed 345
SusWrite 243
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 7.7
106% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 12.3
61% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 131 136 135 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 122
Write 131
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 133
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S939A2UGS-ITR 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback