Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160106
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 00:31
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 159 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 468 45% 370 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% MSI(1462 3750) CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3150 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 106 Parallax 97.1 86% 103 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 97.3 Splatting 84.8 77% 95.2 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37 23,087 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 380 415 389 432 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 609 Write 615 Mixed 599 SusWrite 394 125% 554 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 43.3 144% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 514 DQ Write 97.9 DQ Mixed 174 162% 262 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 284%
Intel 330 Series 180GB 5,848 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 167GB free Firmware: 300i SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 124 126 127 127 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	49% Average	Read 379 Write 110 Mixed 156 SusWrite 117 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 18.3 73% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 67 58% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 83%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140 11,698 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 206GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 67 67 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 88.2 Write 93.2 Mixed 75.6 SusWrite 67.1 60% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 693GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 159 159 159 159 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 157 104% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FC 2TB 1,980 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 154GB free, PID 25fc Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 32 31 32 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 49.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 31.7 48% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS721010G9SA00 100GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 57GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	7.68% Terrible	Read 30.2 Write 28 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 1.9 26% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.68% Great: 17%
WD 4000BEV External 400GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 147GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 28.9 Write 27.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 15.8 32% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 21%
HDS72258 0VLAT20 82GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 76GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 28.3 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 14.3 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 1866 CL10 Series 20GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16.5 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 13.5 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	139x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	29x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	19x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	22x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	12x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	5x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16