Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 19:46
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$181
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 294
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 942
99% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,224
76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
MSI(1462 3050) 2GB
CLim: 955 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 32
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 41
26% 36 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 30
Splatting 23.6
22% 27.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 443 406 251 53 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 466
Mixed 408
SusWrite 271
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.2
181% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 193
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
232GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 84 90 89 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 83.5
Write 87.8
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 88.6
59% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 55%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
89GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.3 9.3 9 11 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,292
Write 4
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 9.2
219% 327 MB/s
4K Read 160
4K Mixed 0
892% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GVGB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 37.1
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 29.5
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $636
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback