Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS XTREME
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 16:58
Run Duration431 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$370
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 150
2-Core 289
99% 178 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 956
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,516
94% 1,516 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$110
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 770 902 854 725 846 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 1,269
Mixed 1,143
SusWrite 861
255% 1133 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 46.2
171% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 862
656% 876 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 194%
Great: 372%
Seagate ST8000NM0065 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: K004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 126 127 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.6% Very poor
Read 199
Write 192
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 125
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.5
7% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST6000NM0105 6TB
645GB free
Firmware: K004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 125 127 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.7% Very poor
Read 212
Write 199
Mixed 104
SusWrite 126
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1.8
11% 4.97 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 7.9
DQ Mixed 2.4
3% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 25%
Seagate ST16000NM002G 16TB
7TB free
Firmware: E002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 126 128 127 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 123
SusWrite 128
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 2.8
43% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.3
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 42%
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$740
96GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 404 217 279 284 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 488
Write 469
Mixed 349
SusWrite 318
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 186
173% 270 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 103%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
146GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 454 462 465 442 315 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 449
Mixed 384
SusWrite 430
94% 414 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 33.4
112% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 307
231% 311 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 104%
Asmt109x- Fast 240GB
34GB free
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 203 124 49 80 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50% Average
Read 460
Write 241
Mixed 222
SusWrite 142
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 20.9
69% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 36
DQ Mixed 25.6
20% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 54%
Kingston SNVS2000GB 2TB
214GB free
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1384 416 32 571 25 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 1,358
Mixed 925
SusWrite 439
217% 968 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 21.2
128% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 740
DQ Mixed 460
438% 687 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 145%
Great: 242%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
233GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 462 421 350 349 347 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 463
Mixed 426
SusWrite 397
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 46.1
148% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 330
248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
LSI Logical Volume 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 214 212 207 211 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 133%
Seagate ST4000NM0023 4TB
528GB free
Firmware: E007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 125 124 124 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 147
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 124
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST4000NM0023 4TB
912GB free
Firmware: E007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 102 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 128
Write 112
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 100
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST6000NM0014 6TB
734GB free
Firmware: K0G5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 144 140 141 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 141
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D34AEEAK.K8FB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 31.6
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 30.8
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS XTREME-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $986
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback