Asus VC65

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Asus VC65 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK VC65
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '22 at 13:17
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108 6,076 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1151p, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 45.6 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 160 53% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 218 8-Core 238 30% 228 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Intel(8086 1912) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 4.2 4% 3.33 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 2.9 Splatting 5.8 3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 80 122 124 128 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 338 Write 128 Mixed 142 SusWrite 117 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 18 67% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 271 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 116 108% 171 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 75%
Ezlink T34 256GB SSD 9 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 204GB free Firmware: 1.07E SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 112 263 254 251 283 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 316 Write 286 Mixed 232 SusWrite 236 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 46.3 4K Mixed 26 86% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 119 114% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 93%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 427GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 73 128 124 123 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 44.5 Write 145 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 115 148% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.M16 1x8GB 4,731 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.1 8% 2.87 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VC65 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VC65

CPU
Core i3-6100TIntel $108Bench 58%, 6,076 samples	14x
Core i5-6400TIntelBench 61%, 8,631 samples	13x
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples	3x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	28x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	3x

SSD
T34 256GB SSDEzlinkBench 75%, 9 samples	3x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	5x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	3x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $108

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16