Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer OL510
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 05:06
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 176
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 398
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 200D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.3
4% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.2% Good
Lighting 79.1
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 67.4
64% 74.4 fps
MRender 80.8
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 60.3
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 109 101 78 64 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 710
Write 126
Mixed 185
SusWrite 89.4
60% 278 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 26.8
103% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 149
122% 177 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 163%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
64GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 525 530 506 457 464 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 508
Mixed 425
SusWrite 499
130% 585 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 31.8
119% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 666
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 526
392% 526 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 127%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 457 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback