Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 133% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$515 50,170 User benchmarks, average bench 89% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 69.2 1-Core 144 2-Core 285 88% 166 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 1,108 98% 829 Pts	64-Core 2,793 173% 2,793 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 164 Parallax 160 122% 158 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 158 Splatting 124 112% 139 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 253 214 225 179 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 850 Write 612 Mixed 768 SusWrite 241 138% 618 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 56.1 175% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 698 DQ Mixed 824 622% 839 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 354%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 882GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 296 329 350 246 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 498 Write 295 Mixed 411 SusWrite 295 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 15.8 80% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 186 144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 125%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB 6,356 User benchmarks, average bench 463% 2TB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3746 2334 3278 2675 2461 2599 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	379% Outstanding	Read 2,685 Write 3,361 Mixed 3,102 SusWrite 2,849 679% 2,999 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 47.5 178% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,165 DQ Write 788 DQ Mixed 955 719% 969 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 379% Great: 614%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 367GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 111 118 93 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 108 Write 97.4 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 106 63% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 127% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 91%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB 898 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 5.5TB free Firmware: GX2M SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 163 160 163 124 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 143 Write 166 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 151 96% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 131%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 126 124 131 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 92.1 Write 54.4 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 116 58% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.7 234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 4x31.8GB 1,068 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.4% Outstanding	MC Read 39 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 35 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 22.9 SC Mixed 30.2 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 177%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,648x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,237x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,076x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,469x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $67Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $904

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16