Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 99.4
43% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 239
27% 214 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 40.4
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 35.3
33% 37.6 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 40
Splatting 25.7
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 500GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 304 410 424 443 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 502
Write 532
Mixed 348
SusWrite 393
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 31.7
81% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 284
215% 289 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 126%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
250GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 157 133 149 180 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 337
Write 236
Mixed 253
SusWrite 159
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 30.5
121% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 357
259% 339 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866EL Series 1866EL Series 1866EL Series 1866EL Series 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback