Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 01:48
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 83.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 274
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 1,080
96% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,900
118% 1,900 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 235
Parallax 243
222% 250 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 217
Splatting 159
175% 222 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 185%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2089 1502 1478 1265 1180 1114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,818
Write 2,395
Mixed 1948
SusWrite 1,438
481% 2,150 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 39.4
148% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 886
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 542
428% 608 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 274%
Great: 411%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 59 59 61 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 385
Write 473
Mixed 348
SusWrite 63
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 21.1
71% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 68.9
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 68.5
57% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 223%
Amd-raid Array 3 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 62 60 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42% Average
Read 83.2
Write 111
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 62.1
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 36.8
130% 45.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 34.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 121%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $976
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback