ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	185.6 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '22 at 22:43
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 378 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 62.9 2-Core 126 55% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 586 49% 425 Pts	64-Core 2,259 140% 2,259 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Nvidia(10DE 1152) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.27 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	50.6% Above average	Lighting 60.1 Reflection 71.4 Parallax 64.1 49% 65.2 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 62.6 Splatting 65.2 54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BX800G4K 800GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 606GB free (System drive) Firmware: G201CS02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 388 384 388 386 383 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 342 Write 393 Mixed 311 SusWrite 386 81% 358 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 23.2 76% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 256 184% 237 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 95%
Netapp X477_WVRDX04TA07 4TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: NA02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 175 Write 44.1 Mixed 57 SusWrite 44.3 59% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 67%
Netapp X477_WVRDX04TA07 4TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3.5TB free Firmware: NA02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 45 44 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 189 Write 43.2 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 44.4 61% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 12x16GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 12 of 12 slots used 192GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 52.8 MC Write 39.6 MC Mixed 42 128% 44.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	154x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback