Today's hottest deals

Shuttle SZ270R9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShuttle SZ270R9  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FZ270
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '22 at 12:28
Run Duration363 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 206
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 540
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8641) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.9% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 96.3
Parallax 58.4
54% 73.5 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 69.2
Splatting 65
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1474 1969 1922 1880 1897 1906 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,301
Write 2,162
Mixed 2,110
SusWrite 1,841
474% 2,104 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 88
280% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 892
665% 886 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 331%
Great: 469%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
171GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 479 478 483 421 275 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 457
Mixed 425
SusWrite 436
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 54.9
180% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
164GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 463 478 482 480 483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 473
Mixed 361
SusWrite 477
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 43.8
153% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 194
190% 304 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 112%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
173GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 462 456 453 443 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 464
Mixed 436
SusWrite 457
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 54.7
177% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
235GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2239 625 619 619 619 619 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,398
Write 2,116
Mixed 1,533
SusWrite 890
387% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 75.6
255% 87.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 753
DQ Mixed 890
669% 900 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 270%
Great: 340%
Tdas TerraMaster 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 38.1
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 10.6
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 112%
Tdas TerraMaster 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 36.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 10.9
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 95%
Tdas TerraMaster 2TB
909GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 15.4
Write 20.4
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 10.4
12% 16 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 92%
Tdas TerraMaster 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 40.4
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 10.8
23% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23.8
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SZ270R9 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Shuttle SZ270R9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback