Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH560
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 145 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 467 45% 371 Pts	64-Core 597 37% 597 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 200F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 164 Parallax 7.9 5% 59.4 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 11.5 8% 9.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D1024 1TB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 487GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQA0904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 880 100 93 75 101 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1,543 Write 1,778 Mixed 1,370 SusWrite 230 276% 1,230 MB/s	4K Read 47.7 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 48.6 176% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 63.1 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 650 363% 338 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 249%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 895GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1853 1595 1681 1489 1497 1502 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	253% Outstanding	Read 1,712 Write 1,596 Mixed 1,515 SusWrite 1,603 362% 1,607 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 65.7 215% 71.1 MB/s	DQ Read 617 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 574 391% 487 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 253% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GB 253 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036 Builds (Compare 768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-036

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	768x

GPU
RTX 3070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 114%, 45,297 samples	346x
RTX 3080 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 125%, 16,265 samples	223x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	189x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	330x
CA5-8D1024 1TBNvmeBench 181%, 641 samples	195x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	226x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	187x
NMSO416F82-3200E 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 253 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370