Dell OptiPlex 7020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7020  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150506
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User KEN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 15.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
53% 110 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 506
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 05A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
DM F5 512G 512GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0521A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 23 17 10 16 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 456
Write 334
Mixed 357
SusWrite 25.7
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 19.9
90% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 1.4
33% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KTW149-ELD Elpida EBJ10UE8BDF0-AE-F Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 6GB
1333, 1067, 1600 MHz
1024, 1024, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 355
11% 355 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7020 Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback