Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory244.7 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 18:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 322
95% 182 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,167
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 5,442
337% 5,442 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A2000 12GB
Nvidia(10DE 1611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.3% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 95.1
Parallax 83.8
68% 87.3 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 75.7
69% 86.5 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black AN1500 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10271043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3453 3188 2959 2979 2987 2984 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 3,578
Mixed 1,722
SusWrite 3,092
576% 2,526 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 69.1
238% 89.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,238
DQ Write 1,019
DQ Mixed 1,111
836% 1,122 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 381%
Great: 420%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
229% Outstanding
MC Read 70.6
MC Write 87.1
MC Mixed 123
267% 93.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 35.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 229%
Great: 229%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 20" 1280 720 ACR00C7 V203H
Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback