Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80ST  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5B1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160905
Uptime15.5 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 00:23
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 37.8
1-Core 21
2-Core 39.5
22% 32.8 Pts
4-Core 55.1
8-Core 56.9
7% 56 Pts
64-Core 62
4% 62 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3809) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 1.38
0% 1.38 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 69.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 86.3
60% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.09
33% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback