Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '15 at 13:42
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 202 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 516 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367A) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Lighting 72.7 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 63.6 59% 69.3 fps	MRender 75.2 Gravity 65.4 Splatting 56.7 53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 128GB-$66 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: JTRA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9326 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 867 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 187 187 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 42 (C2) HDA temperature 74 60 171799412762 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	72.5% Very good	Read 377 Write 353 Mixed 373 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 27.6 84% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 118 113% 178 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 465GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 148286384 (03) Spinup time 100 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2678 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 168 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 26178268069 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21553 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2163 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032857 (BD) vendor-specific 70 70 30 (BE) vendor-specific 73 54 454230043 (C2) HDA temperature 27 46 38654705691 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 27 148286384 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 123059402986551 (F1) Unknown 100 253 335331162 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1909361659	63.3% Good	Read 112 Write 108 Mixed 91.1 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.85 146% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 281GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 139 139 34386739613 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 524 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2892 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 353 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 528 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 528 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 201864380444 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90.5% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 145 Mixed 117 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.19 75% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 99U5403-160.A00LF 24GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.8 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,537x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	955x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	563x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	311x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	274x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	238x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $81Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	141x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	91x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	86x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $471

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $173	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16