Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '23 at 15:43
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	90.2% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 141 2-Core 249 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 940 88% 730 Pts	64-Core 1364 84% 1364 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 147 Parallax 144 120% 146 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 127 Splatting 112 111% 140 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,150 Write 1,664 Mixed 1,447 389% 1,754 MB/s	4K Read 51.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 65.6 216% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 990 DQ Write 695 DQ Mixed 917 664% 867 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Deva's SSD-E240e 240GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 126GB free Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 177 66 72 45 72 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 475 Write 431 Mixed 401 SusWrite 114 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 74.9 4K Mixed 20.3 105% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 1.1 65% 150 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 92%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 98GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,219 Write 1,871 Mixed 1,650 426% 1,913 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 67.7 214% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,042 DQ Write 678 DQ Mixed 925 672% 882 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ZD4-MO132C08-08GYG 4x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.4% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 20.8 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 25 SC Mixed 20.2 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	457x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	377x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $894

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16