Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	20.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200514
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 21 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989 11,853 User benchmarks, average bench 91% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 88.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 259 91% 163 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 853 78% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,441 89% 1,441 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.9% Below average	Lighting 42.9 Reflection 56.1 Parallax 68.2 35% 55.7 fps	MRender 57 Gravity 52.4 Splatting 42.4 41% 50.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NFP035PCI51-3400000 512GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614C0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 408 342 57 467 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	Read 1,476 Write 317 Mixed 548 SusWrite 319 145% 665 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 21.9 93% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 800 DQ Write 92.2 DQ Mixed 178 198% 357 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 250%
2-power SSD2043A 480GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 256GB free Firmware: SAFM13.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 216 375 417 415 408 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 471 Write 394 Mixed 338 SusWrite 368 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 26.9 4K Mixed 21.1 80% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 88.5 DQ Mixed 167 139% 208 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 170 169 178 175 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 186 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 172 105% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	68.1% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 19.9 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 164%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	131x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	112x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	46x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $493

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16